4 ms·
According to some Mozilla people, this part is actually wrong and extension support is indeed not implemented completely. It's merely that I couldn't (and still
by palant 6y ago
According to some Mozilla people, this part is actually wrong and extension support is indeed not implemented completely. It's merely that I couldn't (and still cannot) find a list of outstanding issues, and everything I tried worked correctly.
- causality0 6y agoI wouldn't put it past them to just be straight-up lying.
- palant 6y agoThey don't. Mozilla at this stage is still a very idealistically motivated organization. Most people are trying hard to do the right thing. It's merely that real-life constrains often lead to rather suboptimal results, despite all the good intentions.
- causality0 6y agoThey do lie. Mozilla claimed Quantum was fundamentally incompatible with XUL extensions, despite the fact people could simply build their own Firefox Quantum from source with XUL support turned back on.