4 ms·
That feels like a pretty bad take on how to review changes. You might get better mileage by looking at the context each time. In this case its pretty clear that
by darkwizard42 6y ago
That feels like a pretty bad take on how to review changes. You might get better mileage by looking at the context each time. In this case its pretty clear that the Australian goverment is acting on behalf of specific vested news companies and NOT for the consumer...
It seems dangerous to have this kind of government-on-the-right-track reaction when the corporation cheering it on is in the business of fossil fuels, factory farming, or opiod manufacturing just because a different corporation yells loudly about it.
- catmanjan 6y agoFair enough, I simply don't trust any corporation to act in my interest - if there was a trusted third party lobbying for FB/Google's position I may have another look Of course I would like to see the government go further and upset News Corp as well, but upsetting these two seems like a good first step
- yibg 6y agoFB doesn't have to have your best interests in mind for their actions to make sense. You also don't need to trust them to agree or disagree with them.