3 ms·
>the publishers felt it was doing more harm than good and took it down for that reason. Then the publishers should come out and say so by putting a tagline or
by waterheater 6y ago
>the publishers felt it was doing more harm than good and took it down for that reason.
Then the publishers should come out and say so by putting a tagline or disclaimer at the top of the article. Pulling the whole article to "supervise[] conduct and morals" [1] is textbook censorship.
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censoring https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censoring
- dandelany 6y ago/shrug It’s self-censorship. Publications commonly unpublish bad articles for a wide variety of reasons. Should one not supervise one’s own conduct and morals?