I'm not sure how this sort of article finds itself being published by Nature. I mean, it includes surprisingly wrong assertions such as the following: > In the

I'm not sure how this sort of article finds itself being published by Nature. I mean, it includes surprisingly wrong assertions such as the following: > In the United States, 50-year instability spikes occurred around 1870, 1920 and 1970, so another could be due around 2020. I mean, any freshman who started taking a class in probability understands that that's not how return periods work. At all.