4 ms·
A real, robust knowledge of the relative danger of steroids is tough to develop. Because you can’t plausibly do a long-term blinded trial where you take a heal
by perardi 6y ago
A real, robust knowledge of the relative danger of steroids is tough to develop.
Because you can’t plausibly do a long-term blinded trial where you take a healthy population and dope them up. The in vitro data is enough to make any institutional review board blanch.
So you have to rely on self-reported usage. Which is incredibly unreliable, and full of confounds. (My bias, my fairly well-informed bias, is that nobody is just doing steroids. There is always another drug or high-risk activity.)
So yeah. Steroids are dangerous. Do we know exactly how bad, especially in comparison to other drugs of abuse? Not as far as I can tell. But bad enough that you should absolutely be wary of steroids. (Also there’s gradations of dangerous. You stay away from trenbolone.)
- newsbinator 6y agoWhat are some common high risk activities that coincide with steroid usage, that you mentioned?
- lozaning 6y agoEveryone I know on gear also rides a sports bike, though N does only = 2