5 ms·
The difference is that a chef-in-training works for the Michelin-star chef in the "better" chef's restaurant, and then leaves to start their own restaurant. Ch
by gamblor956 6y ago
The difference is that a chef-in-training works for the Michelin-star chef in the "better" chef's restaurant, and then leaves to start their own restaurant.
China's game plan has been to encourage companies to use Chinese factories based on artificially low prices (subsidized with massive PRC spending), and then to (usually openly) steal the IP and begin making competing products.
This cycle has already happened to over a dozen former clients. I went in-house years ago, but even before then my firm had begun discouraging companies from opening manufacturing facilities in China for any product with any sort of valuable technical IP.
- arcticbull 6y ago> The difference is that a chef-in-training works for the Michelin-star chef in the "better" chef's restaurant, and then leaves to start their own restaurant. > China's game plan has been to encourage companies to use Chinese factories based on artificially low prices (subsidized with massive PRC spending), and then to (usually openly) steal the IP and begin making competing products. "working for" then "starting their own" yeah. See, you get it. Your analogy gets even better, just not in ways you expected, in that people who go work at Michelin starred restaurants in the kitchen do so for low-to-zero wages because the real benefit is the experience they're gaining initially.