4 ms·
> English was arbitrary, so was French and Latin and Greek before it. Might be arbitrary but there isn't really a good reason to change. Compared to the past,
by badsectoracula 6y ago
> English was arbitrary, so was French and Latin and Greek before it.
Might be arbitrary but there isn't really a good reason to change. Compared to the past, right now we have way more people than ever before from around the planet being able to communicate in a single language - English might not be everyone's first language, but it is a fine second language (if anything i'm certain that there are way more people speaking English as a second language than there are people speaking it as a first language).
The main point of a language is communication, why spoil that?
(and FWIW my first language isn't English but i have worked in a couple of other countries with other people whose first language also wasn't English - actually it was several different languages - yet thanks to English everyone was able to communicate, which i think is something to be treasured, not try to disrupt... i mean... we're just discussing things here in English after all)
- reaperducer 6y agoright now we have way more people than ever before from around the planet being able to communicate in a single language My father worked in international trading. He would talk (or Telex) with people in 50 different countries each week. He always said, "English is the international language."
- farias0 6y agoBecause this is not an arbitrary decision made by someone, but a natural, almost unavoidable process.