3 ms·
Are you sure it’ll be awful? Sorbet (https://sorbet.org/ https://sorbet.org/) is pretty popular already. It can statically check your whole project and dynamica
by sosodev 6y ago
Are you sure it’ll be awful? Sorbet (https://sorbet.org/ https://sorbet.org/) is pretty popular already. It can statically check your whole project and dynamically check it at runtime. It also doesn’t add that much overhead so I’m not sure what you’re on about...
- pmarreck 6y agoWhat does it do with your library code that isn't type-specified? If it infers types, isn't there a limit as to how far that can go?
- dbalatero 6y agoNot sure what Ruby core will do, but Sorbet will type everything as T.untyped in the absence of type hints. Libraries can progressively provide rbi files to add first class type support though.
- oomkiller 6y agoSorbet looks really cool, too bad they developed their own typing system that keeps types in a totally separate file instead of adopting it.
- jamesgeck0 6y agoSorbet was developed before the details of the new Ruby type system were locked in. They’re working on providing some convergence in upcoming releases.
- tomc1985 6y agoThe 'separate' file is to avoid breaking backwards compatibility and avoiding a Python2/3 fiasco
- virtue3 6y agoAlso see coffeescript, etc.
- Lio 6y agoSorbet will be compatible with the new file format. We’ll still be able to use the inline Sorbet type signatures. My personal hope is that typing can be included in test/spec files.