3 ms·
I don't think F# needs toys, though. The language is so well put together you don't miss much IDE assist anyway, except to point to you where your code will hav
by fsloth 6y ago
I don't think F# needs toys, though. The language is so well put together you don't miss much IDE assist anyway, except to point to you where your code will have problems compiling.
- pjmlp 6y agoSure it does, a language alone isn't much help if it only gets a tiny slice of the ecosystem. No .NET Native, GUI designers, WCF/gRPC, EF designers, Blend, WinUI tooling, ASP.NET templates,... hinders adoption at corporate level.
- Cybiote 6y agoMy experience is that, compared to most functional languages, F# has a great IDE experience in Rider, Visual Studio and VS Code. But when compared to big industry focused languages, like C# and Java, tooling is middling at best. Ironically, despite .NET core being an excellent runtime, it suffers stigma from being assumed to be too tied to Microsoft platforms. This means, depending on your angle, F# lacking specialized ties to the Windows specific tooling you mention need not be considered a disadvantage.