> If so, I don't know what. Like the things I mentioned. Please read more carefully. > Anyway, I think you're implicitly privileging one abstraction, called a

> If so, I don't know what. Like the things I mentioned. Please read more carefully. > Anyway, I think you're implicitly privileging one abstraction, called an "interpretation" over "just the plain math". One doesn't need to privilege one over the other to ask what the math is about. > Why is an "interpretation" a real thing and not the equations? Nobody thinks the math is not "a real thing." They want to know what the math is about.