4 ms·
I also have no relationship to RH other than as a user of their free stuff. Yes when it became apparent that BTRFS was not ready RH did that. It was a slight s
by gvjddbnvdrbv 6y ago
I also have no relationship to RH other than as a user of their free stuff.
Yes when it became apparent that BTRFS was not ready RH did that. It was a slight surprise when it happened if I remember correctly.
I said RHEL v9 OR 10. I guess 9 is unlikely but 10 is a number of years off. If BTFS is a sucess on Fedora and stable then they will surely consider it. That is the point of Fedora...
- freedomben 6y agoI work for Red Hat but have no insight into any of the Stratis/Btrfs/etc stuff. I'm just a long time Fedora user. I would agree with you. Fedora adopting stuff does not mean RHEL will include it, but if it's successful/popular on Fedora then Red Hat will surely be paying attention. RHEL tries to follow Fedora as closely as possible, I would imagine this is a shot for btrfs, but certainly no guarantee.