> the point of short functions is abstraction and comprehensibility If you have clean code style short functions you get nothing of that. There you split funct

> the point of short functions is abstraction and comprehensibility If you have clean code style short functions you get nothing of that. There you split functions into more functions just for the sake of it. You end up with function names that describe the code worse than how the code describes itself, similar to comments beginner programmers make. Why is a comment "Increments i by one" for i++ not ok, while a function "incrementIByOne" is supposed to be good style? Even if you don't make functions clean code-style ridiculous short, abstractions still come with a cost. You have to do weigh costs and benefits each time.