There is something to consider that the planet goes through its own phases, but the things we measure are 100% correlated to human activity and greenhouse emiss

There is something to consider that the planet goes through its own phases, but the things we measure are 100% correlated to human activity and greenhouse emissions and simple chemistry. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/1912-article-global-warming/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/1912-article-global-warmin... But even without someone from 1912 looking at simple chemistry before there was heavier politics and cognitive dissonance involved, what we are concerned about is a lack of replacement for the ecosystems we rely on, and even just animals that we like rely on. It's almost fine if the earth goes through its own climate cycles, but it is not fine if it doesn't include us and things we like, and when we can also prevent it by cutting emissions and using energy differently while generating energy differently. For example, with coral reefs, we are looking at chronic failures and subsequently adjustments of entire ecosystems and ocean currents and weather patterns, solely because there isn't a replacement phytoplankton to help the corals regulate better.