6 ms·
How fast can something orbit the earth? My standard model of “Thing going really fast” has been some nuclear powered craft that just shoots out into the abyss,
by alextheparrot 6y ago
How fast can something orbit the earth?
My standard model of “Thing going really fast” has been some nuclear powered craft that just shoots out into the abyss, but after a bit of googling apparently our fastest craft is/will be Juno, which is staying within the solar system. This will apparently go 250,000km/hr or 0.000232c partially based on Jupiter’s gravity.
It is interesting to think about just “living fast”, where our lives are still only ~80 years, but the time elapsed on earth is on the order of many multiples of that. We would exist in a way that we orbit the earth at a much larger fraction of light speed, while still allowing us to interact with the earth’s resources on normal time scales. Imagine taking a vacation back to earth for a year, but popping back to the space station where it has only been a few hours.
Maybe I’ll write a novel on that or find one already written, there seems to be a lot of depth in exploring that.
[0] https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/earth-flyby/story/how-fast-can-juno-go https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/earth-flyby/story/how-fast-...
- wlesieutre 6y agoParker Solar Probe is supposed to get up to 690,000 km/hr on a close flyby of the sun!
- ShamelessC 6y agoThe movie Interstellar explores these concepts quite well. it's not 100% accurate but Kipp Thorne was consulted for the visuals on the black holes in the film at least.
- jazzyjackson 6y agoI saw a really moving animated short that used this as part of its plot, but I forget the name (japanese) and haven't been able to google it since. A couple of high school sweethearts promise they'll love each other forever, but there's a war on and the boy quickly gets recruited to fight at the edge of the solar system (I remember a scene where they stand at some railroad tracks and watch a monumental silver space craft fly overhead, one of the battle cruisers), but before he gets there the boy and girl continue their relationship as pen pals, at first sending messages back and forth from mars base (45 minute delay, but not aging any faster), but as the boy travels closer to the front of the war, his velocity increases and he ages less than the girl waiting for him back on earth, and of course more time passes by between messages. Eventually it's the boys 20something birthday and he still has love for the girl, while the girl has already grown up and moved on with her life.
- zapu 6y agoSounds like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voices_of_a_Distant_Star https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voices_of_a_Distant_Star
- jazzyjackson 6y agoYou have solved my puzzle, and I am thankful for it. Edit: hah, figures my bias would mix the genders up, the girl went off to fight the war.
- renewiltord 6y agoIt's probably the Makoto Shinkai film the other guy posted but another book that uses time dilation is The Forever War. And there's the classic Childhood's End.
- rotoradiator 6y agoin shorter version Brian Mays song '39 has similar plot
- pdonis 6y ago>* How fast can something orbit the earth?* If you mean the actual Earth and a free-fall orbit, the orbital speed of something in low earth orbit, like the ISS, about 8 km/sec, is as fast as anything can orbit the earth. To get really fast orbital speeds (as in, speeds that are any significant fraction of the speed of light), you need objects much, much more compact than the Earth, objects whose actual size is not that much larger than the size of a black hole with the same mass. The only non-black hole objects we know of that are anywhere close to that compact are neutron stars.
- Aerroon 6y agoI wonder if black holes or neutron stars in a solar system are necessary for a civilization to start exploring the universe outside of their own solar system. It could be quite a boon to have something like that in the outer solar system for gravity assists.
- MayeulC 6y ago> Imagine taking a vacation back to earth for a year, but popping back to the space station where it has only been a few hours. Hmm, this hasn't really fully clicked with me yet (so take what I am saying with a grain of salt, I'd be glad if anyone could clarify/prove me wrong), but speed is relative. If your station moves fast from the perspective of earth, earth moves fast from the perspective of the station. So, from the perspective of earth, time moves slower on the station, and from the perspective of the station, time moves slower on earth. If you were to travel back and forth, that would even out (something about having to accelerate in one direction, then another). There is no absolute time reference in the universe. That can work, however, if you spend some time inside a strong gravity field.
- alextheparrot 6y agoThe general idea was that we can orbit a fixed reference (In this case the earth) at a high relative speed. At high earth orbit (35km), orbiting the circumference (Simplifying assuming a perfect circle) would mean one orbit done per second would be 2/3c. The time delta math (Sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)) puts us at 3 earth days per two space days. The vacationing was more cheeky, in that in this case a 2 week vacation would appear 3 weeks on earth. If there would be some way to quickly switch between modes than 1 week, you would spend more self-referential time doing something than your home clock would count.