It doesn't need to be trustless. Is this a roundabout way of trying to associate cryptocurrencies with a prerequisite of trustlessness for everything that uses

It doesn't need to be trustless. Is this a roundabout way of trying to associate cryptocurrencies with a prerequisite of trustlessness for everything that uses them? This is just corporations using permissionless architecture, there have been companies doing this on blockchains for almost 10 years. I used to own shares of SatoshiDice for the daily dividends it paid onchain from 2012-2013. The market enforces the behavior. A cartel that pays nice dividends will have a better share price and deeper secondary market, allowing them and their employees to always sell shares for more money. A corporation that doesnt perform well for shareholders doesnt have the same market. I think I’m the one specifically drawing no distinction between criminal groups and liquidity, because they are unrelated concepts.