4 ms·
This article is from three days ago (August 27th, 2020). I suspect the underlying issue was under a 3 year NDA/agreement. It would be misleading to label an ar
by Someone1234 6y ago
This article is from three days ago (August 27th, 2020). I suspect the underlying issue was under a 3 year NDA/agreement.
It would be misleading to label an article from three days ago from "2017," particularly as this is the first reporting about this ever.
- judge2020 6y ago> (I will note, I was never barred from disclosing any of this publicly in any way. As a courtesy, I felt it would be the right thing to do to hold off on public disclosure for a while, potentially indefinitely. Years later, it seems worthwhile to disclose this information and highlight just how far things have come and how Tesla's software security has improved dramatically since then.) From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24327485 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24327485, so no NDA.
- chadlavi 6y agoI'm not saying add "(2017)" I'm saying clarify that the hacker gained the control 3 years ago, not just now.