3 ms·
I respectfully disagree with you. Safari is more limited but some of us like the tradeoff for more privacy. I like to see Google experimenting with new tech i
by mark_l_watson 6y ago
I respectfully disagree with you.
Safari is more limited but some of us like the tradeoff for more privacy.
I like to see Google experimenting with new tech in Chrome but I don’t want everyone to be forced to use Chrome because a few high profile web properties only work with Chrome.
Also, I don’t see anything wrong at all with individual web developers to make some of their sites only work with Chrome if that is what they really want. The global market is huge and targeting subsets and niches is not so bad for small businesses.
- gchamonlive 6y agoFirefox could be a fewer compromises option if the end goal is more security (I am tempted to say no-compromises but that is my own bias, because for my use case Firefox is a perfect chromium replacement, but it might not be for you). Rather, Safari seems to be nice from an integration standpoint if all your ecosystem is apple based.
- mark_l_watson 6y agoI agree. I like Safari on iOS and iPadOS, and run Firefox on my MacBook and my Linux laptops.