What on earth? He wasn't a convicted sex offender until after this sequence of events. You're also assuming that he believed she was 13, which is contradicted b

What on earth? He wasn't a convicted sex offender until after this sequence of events. You're also assuming that he believed she was 13, which is contradicted by his words in the article. HN policy is to assume good faith, but I'm finding that incredibly hard in this discussion. I sincerely hope you never sit on a jury.