5 ms·

Link?

• zrail 6y ago
  The “Current Outlook” section of the Wikipedia article gives a reasonable overview of the literature. This reddit thread has additional links: https://www.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/fv5oyh/has_the_clathrate_gun_hypothesis_been_debunked/ https://www.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/fv5oyh/has_t...
  • specialist 6y ago
    Thank you. Will read. It'd be nice if its wikipedia page was updated to reflect this best available science. (Quickly scanning its /Talk: page, I can't make heads or tails of its current status. Sorry.)
  • marvin 6y ago
    Is this subreddit reliable? A cursory read of the comments left me with the impression that human-caused climate change is no big deal, and that makes me wary regarding whether other claims from there are to be counted upon.
    • makerofspoons 6y ago
      The links are often fine, but the sub in my experience is not. The head moderator also moderates /r/climateskeptics and there is a significant overlap between the two subreddits' userbases. This wouldn't be a problem necessarily but many of these users argue in bad faith and derail the discourse on the sub.
      • marvin 6y ago
        This seems like a common climate denial tactic. I’m seeing it in my home country as well. Lots of truly bad-faith skeptic contributions to climate change forums on Facebook, made by people who obviously don’t care about science or evidence.