3 ms·
Thanks for the suggestion but Haskell would not be Haskell without its ML-yness. As confusing as operator precedence can get, I do see the beauty in "programma
by yomly 6y ago
Thanks for the suggestion but Haskell would not be Haskell without its ML-yness.
As confusing as operator precedence can get, I do see the beauty in "programmable whitespace" but to get anywhere close in other language syntaxes you need to do even more perverse things like here [1]
If I did have to choose a different syntax for haskell it would be S-expressions rather than Algol so perhaps Hackett from Lexi Lambda
[1] https://stackoverflow.com/a/48553568 https://stackoverflow.com/a/48553568