5 ms·
That video does not appear to show anything for four minutes. Did I miss something? Edit: Now I have a feeling that I got trolled and that's the point of the v
by natcombs 6y ago
That video does not appear to show anything for four minutes. Did I miss something?
Edit: Now I have a feeling that I got trolled and that's the point of the video
- unkeptbarista 6y agoThe action is easy to miss after nearly two minutes of nothing happening. If you fast forward you might not see it at all. 1:54 What I believe is the signal flash near the fencing. Lower left of the video. 2:06 You will see sparks from a bullet striking the fencing. A bit higher up than the signal flash, and on the extreme left of the video. 3:01 Toward the middle right of the video, a bullet striking the fencing. Update: NPR article with timing of events seen in video. They say first flash is also bullet related and not the signal flash I thought it might be. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/02/05/272015606/sniper-attack-on-calif-power-station-raises-terrorism-fears https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/02/05/272015606...
- urda 6y agoThanks so much for this.
- daneel_w 6y agoThere are a few smaller and larger sparks now and then. The resolution, quality and low frame rate renders the entire video more or less useless.
- guerrilla 6y agoStarting at 1:50 you can see a flash at the bottom, after 2:00 you can see sparks occasionally on the left fence and the fence to the top-right. There's more sparks before 3:00. The video could certainly be shortened.
- Cactus2018 6y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQzAbKdLfW8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQzAbKdLfW8 The 3:01 spark is the best. Could this video could be processed (AI!) to remove the background and highlight the interesting bits.