3 ms·
> Is the only available counterweight for their behaviour "drop everything and buy a new $500 phone to express your discontent?" No. The counterweight is not b
by nodamage 6y ago
> Is the only available counterweight for their behaviour "drop everything and buy a new $500 phone to express your discontent?"
No. The counterweight is not buying an iPhone in the first place if side loading is important to you.
- d3nj4l 6y agoThat does not fix the problem for content creators, who have to target the nearly 50% of the US market that's on iOS. I'm sure everyone at Basecamp would prefer to use androids, but they just can't be competitive with other e-mail services without releasing the Hey app for iOS.
- RonanTheGrey 6y agoThis is part of the problem; there are entire industries now that rely on mobile device deployment. It would be untenable and unreasonable to say "hey you don't like it, F off, just don't deploy on iOS, you can always willingly give up access to over 1 billion users you know". It just doesn't even sound reasonable. In those industries - mobile gaming is one, a $150 billion a year market reaching a whopping 50% of all mobile users across platforms, that requires presence on iOS if you want to build a business in any serious way. This is where Apple is going to have a really, really hard time avoiding an accusation (and judgement) of antitrust. They literally control industries. This means that they probably have to give up some control of their platform.
- nodamage 6y agoContent creators don't have a legal right to demand to distribute to a specific smartphone any more than they have a legal right to demand to distribute inside Walmart.
- d3nj4l 6y ago> Content creators don't have a legal right to demand to distribute to a specific smartphone. That is the exact scope of the anti-trust case here, and unless you're the most preeminent expert in the field I'm not inclined to take your word in whether they have the legal right or not.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- kalleboo 6y agoWell maybe they should