3 ms·
Yeah, I should have said -600, -700, -800, -900 instead of -6, -7, -8, -9. For some reason I got that naming convention mixed up, and forgot that the -800 was
by DuskStar 6y ago
Yeah, I should have said -600, -700, -800, -900 instead of -6, -7, -8, -9.
For some reason I got that naming convention mixed up, and forgot that the -800 was NG while -8 was MAX.
The 737-200 is one of the first-gen 737s, and still active today, though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737#737-200 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737#737-200
- sjm-lbm 6y agoSibling comment got it, but I was thinking about the MAX 200/737-8200, which is a variant of the -8 that has more exit doors and therefore can have a higher seating density. Totally agree that the model numbers are confusing, though (obviously).