2 ms·
Yes I'll be interested to see how it turns out. Any blog posts / writing on the procedural viewpoint will be appreciated. Does Rust have something like C++'s
by chubot 6y ago
Yes I'll be interested to see how it turns out. Any blog posts / writing on the procedural viewpoint will be appreciated.
Does Rust have something like C++'s const methods? Where you can have a method that mutates a member, but doesn't logically mutate from the caller's perspective?
It seems like you could be prevented from having races on individual variables, but still have races at a higher level.
Like on database cells. I guess no language will help you with that, and that's why Hickey wrote Datomic -- to remove mutability from the database.
- ragnese 6y ago> Does Rust have something like C++'s const methods? Where you can have a method that mutates a member, but doesn't logically mutate from the caller's perspective? Yes! "Interior mutatbility" is the term to search for. In Rust, you'd wrap the field in a RefCell<T>. Many connection-pool implementations use interior mutability to manage the connections transparently to the caller. Interior mutability is basically what, e.g. OCaml, does by default. In Rust, it's opt-in. Yeah, DB ops are always a sticking point for figuring out how to write my APIs.