2 ms·
You're arguing a point that the parent poster never made. The parent poster simply said that they want to join communities free of (or, mostly free of) hate sp
by ziddoap 6y ago
You're arguing a point that the parent poster never made.
The parent poster simply said that they want to join communities free of (or, mostly free of) hate speech and that being free/mostly free of hate speech is an attractive quality for them.
Not once did they advocate for denying infrastructure or any of the other things your entire comment is based on. In fact, they stated the opposite.
- icebraining 6y agoBut is Reddit a community, or is it infrastructure to create communities (which would be the subreddits)?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- HelloMcFly 6y agoEngage in whatever wordplay you want: reddit is a website built on community content and interaction. That there are user-created communities within the larger community does not turn it into some sort of "infrastructure" of internet expression. The infrastructure to build one's own site, and communities that go with it, are and should continue to be made available to all regardless of viewpoint. Given Voat's existence and the fact that people do use it, I do not see a problem.