This is a technique I often see from the fact-checking sources. A claim such as Spygate will be conflated with something more ridiculous like Q. The ridiculous

This is a technique I often see from the fact-checking sources. A claim such as Spygate will be conflated with something more ridiculous like Q. The ridiculous is used to ridicule the first claim. In fairness, Spygate is currently being investigated by the DOJ. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesmith-durham-investigation.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/us/politics/kevin-clinesm... Attributing Spygate to Q is a convenient way to discredit it. Regardless, coverage of Spygate is not equivalent to propagating Q theories. The entire discussion digresses from the topic at hand.