4 ms·
I think that's the case already? He's communicating with some unauthorized API that's hosted on a third party. Apple's argument is that they know that there's
by akmarinov 6y ago
I think that's the case already?
He's communicating with some unauthorized API that's hosted on a third party.
Apple's argument is that they know that there's no official API so his can't be legal.
- dgellow 6y agoOh, I see, then I misunderstood their situation. Thanks for clarifying.
- dzhiurgis 6y ago"I'm accessing API of RealSweetSolutions GMBH as far as I know. It is impossible for me to know their relationship with Apple".
- dgellow 6y agoSure, that's what I thought too, but at the end of the day it is a judgement call from Apple, if they think you're hiding your use of unofficial APIs, I guess they will also deny your updates... So much power in a company is really scary IMHO.
- ericlewis 6y agoHmm, I doubt that is the case. It’s almost certain they are using TeslaSwift, an open source swift implementation that communicates directly with Tesla’s own private APIs. It’s quite common for you to instead do such a thing, since the cost of hosting such a service is nothing for you. The APIs are also extremely stable, so it’s not like Tesla is going to pull the rug from under you. The only benefit of layering your own API on top of Tesla’s would be some sort of data collection.