3 ms·
> You are mixing up fiction and fact. She wasn't 13, at best she was (poorly) trying to pose as a 13yo. The sex offender caught in the sting was trying to meet
by rumanator 6y ago
> You are mixing up fiction and fact. She wasn't 13, at best she was (poorly) trying to pose as a 13yo.
The sex offender caught in the sting was trying to meet a 13 years old girl. That fact was even admitted by the sex offender before, during, and after the arrest.
> He correctly assumed her age despite her lying about it:
No, he tried to downplay the fact he was actively trying to have sex with an underage girl by claiming that, when he was caught trying to have sex with an underage girl, no officer from the police department that arrested him when he drove to the 13 year old girl's address with the explicit purpose of having sex with her was really an underage girl.
- hanselot 6y agoInteresting that this mindless fallacious nonsense is allowed on here, despite the very concise rules on trolling. Either this guy is a troll, or the police's astroturfing division. I can't bring myself to believe anyone could be this hardheaded.
- eecc 6y agoDude, you do sound like stubborness incarnate. You’re trying to assert your subjective perception as an unquestionable truth, while everyone else is trying to make the point that this truth really is ambiguous (because of the underlying lie that the subject of the article correctly guessed.) If anything, reading this exchange gives me the uncomfortable feeling of what it would feel to argue with a Taliban.