4 ms·

> Odd, the article describe a 24yo girl actively trying to meet a 20yo for sex The article describes a sting operation led by a 24 year-old police officer that

> Odd, the article describe a 24yo girl actively trying to meet a 20yo for sex The article describes a sting operation led by a 24 year-old police officer that caught a man actively trying to have sex with a girl he was fully aware was 13 year old. He repeatedly asked her age, she repeatedly made it quite clear she was 13 years old, and he proceeded to try to meet up with the underage girl with for the explicit intent of having sex with her.

choo-t 6y ago
>girl he was fully aware was 13 year old. You are mixing up fiction and fact. She wasn't 13, at best she was (poorly) trying to pose as a 13yo. >He repeatedly asked her age, she repeatedly made it quite clear she was 13 years old He correctly assumed her age despite her lying about it: “why did you post an ad in craigslist if your 13? You mean 23?” Keep in mind she was on a adult website, actively searching for sex and send a photo of her as an adult. >he proceeded to try to meet up with the underage girl with for the explicit intent of having sex with her. Neither the girl on the photo nor the girl receiving him was underage, nor she look underage.
- rumanator 6y ago
  > You are mixing up fiction and fact. She wasn't 13, at best she was (poorly) trying to pose as a 13yo. The sex offender caught in the sting was trying to meet a 13 years old girl. That fact was even admitted by the sex offender before, during, and after the arrest. > He correctly assumed her age despite her lying about it: No, he tried to downplay the fact he was actively trying to have sex with an underage girl by claiming that, when he was caught trying to have sex with an underage girl, no officer from the police department that arrested him when he drove to the 13 year old girl's address with the explicit purpose of having sex with her was really an underage girl.
  - hanselot 6y ago
    Interesting that this mindless fallacious nonsense is allowed on here, despite the very concise rules on trolling. Either this guy is a troll, or the police's astroturfing division. I can't bring myself to believe anyone could be this hardheaded.
  - eecc 6y ago
    Dude, you do sound like stubborness incarnate. You’re trying to assert your subjective perception as an unquestionable truth, while everyone else is trying to make the point that this truth really is ambiguous (because of the underlying lie that the subject of the article correctly guessed.) If anything, reading this exchange gives me the uncomfortable feeling of what it would feel to argue with a Taliban.

choo-t 6y ago

>girl he was fully aware was 13 year old. You are mixing up fiction and fact. She wasn't 13, at best she was (poorly) trying to pose as a 13yo. >He repeatedly asked her age, she repeatedly made it quite clear she was 13 years old He correctly assumed her age despite her lying about it: “why did you post an ad in craigslist if your 13? You mean 23?” Keep in mind she was on a adult website, actively searching for sex and send a photo of her as an adult. >he proceeded to try to meet up with the underage girl with for the explicit intent of having sex with her. Neither the girl on the photo nor the girl receiving him was underage, nor she look underage.

rumanator 6y ago
> You are mixing up fiction and fact. She wasn't 13, at best she was (poorly) trying to pose as a 13yo. The sex offender caught in the sting was trying to meet a 13 years old girl. That fact was even admitted by the sex offender before, during, and after the arrest. > He correctly assumed her age despite her lying about it: No, he tried to downplay the fact he was actively trying to have sex with an underage girl by claiming that, when he was caught trying to have sex with an underage girl, no officer from the police department that arrested him when he drove to the 13 year old girl's address with the explicit purpose of having sex with her was really an underage girl.
- hanselot 6y ago
  Interesting that this mindless fallacious nonsense is allowed on here, despite the very concise rules on trolling. Either this guy is a troll, or the police's astroturfing division. I can't bring myself to believe anyone could be this hardheaded.
- eecc 6y ago
  Dude, you do sound like stubborness incarnate. You’re trying to assert your subjective perception as an unquestionable truth, while everyone else is trying to make the point that this truth really is ambiguous (because of the underlying lie that the subject of the article correctly guessed.) If anything, reading this exchange gives me the uncomfortable feeling of what it would feel to argue with a Taliban.