4 ms·
Even such low barriers as a small form do wonders for the quality of people on the other side, you won't be missed. (if you genuinely can't be bothered)
by pengaru 6y ago
Even such low barriers as a small form do wonders for the quality of people on the other side, you won't be missed. (if you genuinely can't be bothered)
- INTPenis 6y agoHarsh but true, I remember telling my life story to sign up for text based message boards.
- Krisando 6y agoFrom personal experience in running similar things, they aren't a good method of discerning quality of people.
- NalNezumi 6y agoI'm curious, what are the "good" methods for discerning/filtering quality of people? How are "good" and "bad" quality of people categorized? (binary? spectrum/distribution?) How can you estimate/measure the quality of the filter/method with precision? I assume no filter is perfect and mistakenly filter out "good" quality people too, so if this method isn't good that suggest there's a metric and a more efficient method out there. In your personal experience what worked better?
- kristopolous 6y agoI've really liked metafilters $5 lifetime membership model. Seems to work
- Krisando 6y ago> I'm curious, what are the "good" methods for discerning/filtering quality of people? Observation is probably the best method. I rarely have found form options to be effective. A good chunk of 'good' people tend to get filtered out from my observation. Generally the approach that has worked for me having a tier system. People who meet your criteria get greater access etc over time. > How are "good" and "bad" quality of people categorized? Generally, "good" is anyone that helps your community prosper. "Bad" are typically people who cause unwanted conflicts, create a toxic environment etc.
- zhte415 6y agoHappy not to be missed.
- tasubotadas 6y agoIf that's the attitude on the other side, then I guess the feeling is mutual :).