> At least you'd have due process and couldn't be deplatformed for legal activity. Now you have neither. I don't understand your train of thought. I mean, you

> At least you'd have due process and couldn't be deplatformed for legal activity. Now you have neither. I don't understand your train of thought. I mean, you are arguing for a monopoly controlling a centralized service just because one of the many freely available payment platforms you personally choosed may have terms of service you might break? How is that a solution? It seems you are not arguing for a solution to the problem you framed. You're instead confusing wishful thinking with a solution to the problem. I mean, your suggestions don't even qualify as unintended consequences: they are only unrealistic and absurd expectations from a reform that has absolutely no relation to the problem.