> "...for a repeat offender following multiple strikes." from tfa: > "Because of three minor non-violent convictions stemming from the same arrest at age 18,

> "...for a repeat offender following multiple strikes." from tfa: > "Because of three minor non-violent convictions stemming from the same arrest at age 18, he was labeled a habitual offender." that's like calling 3 strikes on the same pitch. in an exhibition game, so that you end up banned from real games for life. it's a gross perversion of justice. in no circumstance should robbery without harm be more than a few days/weeks of jail. and he could have worked off the $50 in restitution if need be.