3 ms·
I've been using Fuel for a number of weeks now, and I'm generally really liking it. I agree with the Twig recommendation though, and did drop Twig in almost imm
by datasink 16y ago
I've been using Fuel for a number of weeks now, and I'm generally really liking it. I agree with the Twig recommendation though, and did drop Twig in almost immediately.
To answer your question specifically: it would be smart to use Twig by default, rather than developing your own custom Fuel template engine, because you would need to spend a significant amount of time to get something with the same feature-set, build quality and documentation coverage. Would this time not be better spent elsewhere?
As a pretty content Fuel user, I should also mention that your tone doesn't benefit the project.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- philsturgeon 16y agoThere is no reason for us picking a specific templating engine as default. I will eventually (when I find the time) complete my parser package which will make thighs very easy to use a template "parser", with drivers for various engines. Sure you may like Twig, but I might think it sucks. Somebody else might want Dwoo, Smarty, Mustache, etc. Why would any of us be more correct than anyone else?