As many other readers here I disagree with that statement as it stands. Saying that a new idea is not valid because it is not like the old idea is wrong in itse

As many other readers here I disagree with that statement as it stands. Saying that a new idea is not valid because it is not like the old idea is wrong in itself. But when I look behind this little logical error, I find a quite valuable analysis. Before I really thought K.A. might be the "university killer". Now I see it more as opening up the spectrum of ways, we can teach and learn.