4 ms·
That's not something you can have at your home though, no? The DEXA/DXA scans machine I know of are something you can't keep at the comfort of your home. In my
by actuator 6y ago
That's not something you can have at your home though, no? The DEXA/DXA scans machine I know of are something you can't keep at the comfort of your home.
In my personal experience I have found impedance ones to be fairly accurate(~10%, BF range 10-16) and for most people the accuracy of full body ones is good to have a general idea about their body. Probably when you reach sub 10 levels, accuracy matters more.
Btw, here is the link to studies they give: https://inbodyusa.com/studies/ https://inbodyusa.com/studies/
- parliament32 6y agoI've also found about a 10-point discrepancy. There's a huge difference between 15% and 25% bf.. one is approaching athletic while the other is obese. DXA is definitely less convenient, but there's no real reason to test your bf% daily (just like weighing yourself daily isn't productive, you need to look at average changes over time). Considering the amount of time it takes to significantly change your bf%, twice a year testing would be plenty.. and would probably cost you the same amount as this subscription service.
- whatch 6y agoMaybe weighing daily IS productive, but looking at the result daily is not :)