3 ms·
Not sure about normal ebooks, but it's been a fantastic tool for getting through IETF RFCs. No distractions, easy on the eyes. Would be nice if the contrast we
by cordite 6y ago
Not sure about normal ebooks, but it's been a fantastic tool for getting through IETF RFCs.
No distractions, easy on the eyes. Would be nice if the contrast were even better for low light environments. Maybe this 2.0 would do it.
I seem to have lost my pen though, so I'm not sure what I'll do for any annotation now.
- minxomat 6y agoI second RFC, I've implemented plenty of them while scribbling over them on the RM1. Also great to quickly show a colleague something on a page. But, the eBook (as in published books) experience is pretty bad compared to basically anything. What even the RM2 does is just load the epub/pdf into the editing buffer and other than somewhat faster navigation and a hidden menu, it's not good at all for consumption.
- surajs 6y agoknew they had to skimp somewhere to bring the costs down, predictably, they went with software.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Zenbit_UX 6y agoThat's disappointing, I'd love it to be a great e-book reader, I want to love it... If they could just side load the Kindle or kobo app I'd buy it in a second. For now, I'll keep reading ebooks on my phone.
- packetlost 6y agoI'm curious, what format do you consume IETF RFCs in?
- cordite 6y agoI personally get the PDFs, sometimes links work. PDFs are also a bit friendly for annotation, at least in my experience with GoodReader on the ipad.
- driverdan 6y agoThey sell replacement pens.