4 ms·
I've always thought Dyson make terrible _products_. The innards of a Dyson vacuum cleaner are no doubt ingenious, but the early models all weighed a ton and wer
by thom 16y ago
I've always thought Dyson make terrible _products_. The innards of a Dyson vacuum cleaner are no doubt ingenious, but the early models all weighed a ton and were incredibly difficult to lug around the house and actually clean stuff.
Same with the AirBlade. Clever idea, but it doesn't dry your hands, and the blast of air knocks your hands into the sides, negating all the claims of better hygiene.
I'm sure the Dyson process involves tons of prototypes, but I don't for a second believe they actually spend much time looking at people _using_ the damn things.
- GiraffeNecktie 16y agoNever used a Dyson vacuum but I've used the Airblade and it worked astonishingly well.
- eru 16y agoI like the Airblade, too. It does dry your hands quite fast. And I've never had my hands knocked to the site by it. (I can't say anything about the economy or hygiene, but it's one of the hand driers I actually use. I am much to impatient for the conventional ones.)
- jcampbell1 16y agoI agree that they work really well, the problem is they are disgusting looking after a year or so. They collect water in the bottom, the paint chips, and the yellow piece of rubber often have mildew. The XLERATOR dryers are just a quick, and all the water is blown on the floor which makes more sense.