3 ms·
For starters, that's a totally unrelated issue from what the other poster was talking about. That is clearly a bug and not an expected behaviour. But consider
by shawnz 6y ago
For starters, that's a totally unrelated issue from what the other poster was talking about. That is clearly a bug and not an expected behaviour.
But consider that you don't use any other household tool for 8+ hours a day, and other household tools are not designed to serve a rapidly moving target of constantly changing application needs.
- kd5bjo 6y ago> That is clearly a bug and not an expected behaviour. No, it’s just a reflection that the pace of updates exceeded my pace of attempting to use Windows. These all applied successfully, and an immediate reboot was fine. > But consider that you don’t use any other household tool for 8+ hours a day I don’t use my household computer nearly that much, either. At a guess, it sees a comparable amount of use as my dishwasher which demands significantly less attention. (My office computer is a different story). > Other household tools are not designed to serve a rapidly moving target of constantly changing application needs. Regardless of its design intent, my application needs aren’t rapidly changing: I use a computer for roughly the same things as I did 1 or 2 or 3 years ago. Why should I pay the time cost of upgrades to enable features I have no intention of using?