3 ms·

> My point is you should be directing your criticism to government data collection practices I agree. It's not a binary choice, though: if I rob a bank, and yo

> My point is you should be directing your criticism to government data collection practices I agree. It's not a binary choice, though: if I rob a bank, and you drive the getaway car, I'm clearly guilty, but you share some responsibility. The point is that there is enough culpability to go around. Re: my examples (in the same order)... HSBC https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hsbc-usa-idUSKBN1E50YA https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hsbc-usa-idUSKBN1E50YA EDO MBM Technology ltd https://www.undocs.org/en/S/2018/594 https://www.undocs.org/en/S/2018/594 IBM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust It's a reasonable position to complain about a company who knowingly enables bad behaviour of a third party, even if they don't directly carry it out.

michannne 6y ago
It still doesn't make any sense. Tell me: is the bus driver culpable if the murderer took the bus to get away from the scene of the crime?
- uniqueid 6y ago
  In many cases: yes. It depends on whether the driver aids the criminal knowingly (eg: overheard "To my ex-husband's, driver! Can't wait to shoot him in the face"), and of the driver's own free will (eg: did not overhear "if you don't take me, I'll shoot you, too!")
  - michannne 6y ago
    Ok, if the government says, "Hey Palantir, we have this data and we need you to group everyone by religion and political affiliation", is it then also Palantir's fault if the government uses that resulting analysis for discrimination?