If a computer can generate something of equal quality without human input, I don't consider it art. Sure, CGI looks realistic. But realistic imagery is not enou

If a computer can generate something of equal quality without human input, I don't consider it art. Sure, CGI looks realistic. But realistic imagery is not enough for something to be art, and neither is random splashes of color. There is nothing here that points to beauty, higher values, truth, or anything. If it helps you zone out, sure, but again, not art. White noises helps some people zone out. This is basically white noise with extra steps. And Im referring to Pollock's work. This website is arguably more artistic than his painting.