3 ms·

>If you had to set one metric to use as a leading indicator for yourself as a knowledge worker, the best I know might be the number of Evergreen notes written p

>If you had to set one metric to use as a leading indicator for yourself as a knowledge worker, the best I know might be the number of Evergreen notes written per day. Oy.

branweb 6y ago
what's the problem with it? Isn't a good metric going to be numeric, kinda of necessity?...also since these are his personal notes, shouldn't we assume the "you" there means himself? So who's he keeping outside the gate?
- meheleventyone 6y ago
  I guess the biggest criticism is it promotes quantity over quality. Similar to counting lines of code or pages of a book written. Although I think it’s safe to assume in this case there is some implicit notion of minimum quality to consider a note “written”.
  - branweb 6y ago
    ah i see that and yeah after reviewing the concept of evergreen notes, I think your assumption is a safe one ...though the original post (pre-edit) was something like "oy using volume of notes written as a gatekeeper for knowledge work", which seems like a slightly different criticism of the statement.
    - meheleventyone 6y ago
      I didn’t see the pre-edit version so did wonder where the gate keeping bit came from. That sort of uncharitable take is why I’d never put my notes online. I’d find it extremely stressful.
082349872349872 6y ago
Knowledge workers are refrigerators: meals + information ⟶ knowledge + heat A traditional measure of a knowledge worker is in papers/year. To find a higher-frequency leading indicator, notes/day seems apropos. (The heat above is generated at O(100W). Unfortunately that doesn't correlate well with knowledge produced, or we could just use it as a measure. Would an intermediate measure be drafts/week?) Highly recommended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6rVHr6OwjI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6rVHr6OwjI
krmboya 6y ago
Does number of lines of code deleted also count?

>If you had to set one metric to use as a leading indicator for yourself as a knowledge worker, the best I know might be the number of Evergreen notes written per day. Oy.

branweb 6y ago

what's the problem with it? Isn't a good metric going to be numeric, kinda of necessity?...also since these are his personal notes, shouldn't we assume the "you" there means himself? So who's he keeping outside the gate?

meheleventyone 6y ago
I guess the biggest criticism is it promotes quantity over quality. Similar to counting lines of code or pages of a book written. Although I think it’s safe to assume in this case there is some implicit notion of minimum quality to consider a note “written”.
- branweb 6y ago
  ah i see that and yeah after reviewing the concept of evergreen notes, I think your assumption is a safe one ...though the original post (pre-edit) was something like "oy using volume of notes written as a gatekeeper for knowledge work", which seems like a slightly different criticism of the statement.
  - meheleventyone 6y ago
    I didn’t see the pre-edit version so did wonder where the gate keeping bit came from. That sort of uncharitable take is why I’d never put my notes online. I’d find it extremely stressful.

082349872349872 6y ago

Knowledge workers are refrigerators: meals + information ⟶ knowledge + heat A traditional measure of a knowledge worker is in papers/year. To find a higher-frequency leading indicator, notes/day seems apropos. (The heat above is generated at O(100W). Unfortunately that doesn't correlate well with knowledge produced, or we could just use it as a measure. Would an intermediate measure be drafts/week?) Highly recommended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6rVHr6OwjI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6rVHr6OwjI

krmboya 6y ago

Does number of lines of code deleted also count?