3 ms·
So, by that logic I assume you're in favor of legalizing things like crack cocaine and methamphetamine? After all, if someone is a against such products, they h
by a1369209993 6y ago
So, by that logic I assume you're in favor of legalizing things like crack cocaine and methamphetamine? After all, if someone is a against such products, they have the choice to not buy them. (Not entirely rhetorical - I can imagine a internally consistent position with those principles, I just don't think you actually hold it.)
- abakker 6y agoI think it is pretty easy to allow consistent viewpoints which hold that crack and copyrights are different things. But, yeah, I think we might find some common ground on legalizing drugs and treating addictions as medical conditions. banning them hasn’t really had fantastic outcomes.
- a1369209993 6y ago> But, yeah, I think we might find some common ground on legalizing drugs and treating addictions as medical conditions. banning them hasn't really had fantastic outcomes. Fair point, yes. As a better example, I am quite happy to sacrifice slave traders's jobs for my ideals. (As a added bonus, this one is actually ontologically related via the notion that it's possible to have legitimate property interests in (parts of) a person or persons.)