> You seem to have invented some sort of persecution scenario that I'm pretty sure doesn't exist. It's not persecution. It's just that recently you can't have

> You seem to have invented some sort of persecution scenario that I'm pretty sure doesn't exist. It's not persecution. It's just that recently you can't have a discussion about OCaml without having an Haskell devotee dropping by and implying you should use Haskell instead generally for somewhat spurious reasons (same with Rust but the languages are so different, it's easier to ignore). It gets a bit tiring. > think this is a ~complete non-issue mostly brought up by people who haven't actually used Haskell much at all. We might have to agree to disagree on this one. > Not having a well-functioning asynchronous programming system (Async sucks). It's a chance everyone uses Lwt then. Pretty much no one uses Async apart from Jane Street. > Also, OCaml does have a clone of Lens, but it was only written in the last year. Another example of how OCaml is very far behind Haskell in terms of development/production readiness. OCaml has multiple lenses libraries including one written by Jane Street which are not used a lot because mutations are fine. This is not being far behind. It is being practical.