> 1.) If it can be pirated, it should be pirate-able. > Taken to the extreme, does this extend to the realm of people's appearance? This would fall under tra

> 1.) If it can be pirated, it should be pirate-able. > Taken to the extreme, does this extend to the realm of people's appearance? This would fall under trademark, not copyright. It's perfectly consistent to believe that the government shouldn't erect artificial barriers to the price of legitimate copies asymptotically approaching the cost of copying and distribution (near zero in the modern age) while still believing that the government should enforce some trademark restrictions to protect brands (including one's "personal brand").