4 ms·
By this logic, shouldn't a person be indifferent between 1) an accident where they die, and 2) an accident where they and their partner die, since "being dead i
by croissants 6y ago
By this logic, shouldn't a person be indifferent between 1) an accident where they die, and 2) an accident where they and their partner die, since "being dead is not an experience"?
- ikeboy 6y agoYour framing is wrong. Neither of those two textual descriptions represent something that could possibly happen. It's as nonsensical as asking "should you be indifferent between xhskgkrid happening or kwntocusbw happening?" If you take strong verificationism seriously, that is. I can't give the entire theory here, but there are strong arguments for it, and also critiques that I personally don't find compelling.