3 ms·
>Or maybe this is a defense mechanism borne from denial and the urge to put off the inevitable. Sure, could be. > You’re talking about outliving the stars the
by staticassertion 6y ago
>Or maybe this is a defense mechanism borne from denial and the urge to put off the inevitable.
Sure, could be.
> You’re talking about outliving the stars themselves when we can barely get piles of rocks to survive a few millennia.
Maybe so. I won't pretend to understand what would go into such a thing. I don't personally believe our understanding of the universe is sufficient to rule it out.
> But it was already thousands of years ago that our interpretation of life and the value we derive from it reached the understanding that death was not to be feared in the first place.
I guess I missed that! I mostly see a lot of mental gymnastics or denial in the form of believe in an after-life.
- philwelch 6y ago> I guess I missed that! I mostly see a lot of mental gymnastics or denial in the form of believe in an after-life. I guess I don’t see the big distinction between some science-fiction fantasy of living for a quadrillion years and disproving the second law of thermodynamics and just believing in an afterlife. The alternative to either approach is discussed in OP :)
- staticassertion 6y agoHa, that's definitely fair. I suppose the false premise is that either is necessarily achievable. Sometimes there isn't a good answer.