This would be like going through the full material of calculus (1,2,3) and saying “it’s trivial and therefore not impressive nor worth learning” after every sin

This would be like going through the full material of calculus (1,2,3) and saying “it’s trivial and therefore not impressive nor worth learning” after every single proof, derivation, lecture, and homework problem. You can do it, but you’ve not actually demonstrated any knowledge of the material. Nor would such refutation actually prove that calculus doesn’t contribute greatly to the modern world.