4 ms·
The wording here is subtly different from the text they reportedly emailed out - https://twitter.com/rjonesy/status/1298662658934222848 https://twitter.com/rjon
by bonaldi 6y ago
The wording here is subtly different from the text they reportedly emailed out - https://twitter.com/rjonesy/status/1298662658934222848 https://twitter.com/rjonesy/status/1298662658934222848
Notably, it omits the line saying they won't use the prompt in their own apps (which they'd be required to do whether or not they used IDFA) and omits the advice that implies their customers should figure out other ways to gather identifying information
- Despegar 6y agoThe response to that is to just not allow them to update their app until they comply.
- Spivak 6y agoNot sure why you got downvoted for this. I expect that this will be Apple’s response 100%. They would come off so good putting up a fight for users.
- Despegar 6y agoProbably because Apple's total control of the platform is why this change could happen. Their ability to not allow a developer to distribute an app update that doesn't comply with the new privacy change stems from the same power that allows them to collect 30/15% of in-app purchases.
- judge2020 6y ago> Use non-IDFA match methods such as adopting Facebook Login or using Advanced Matching to share hashed customer contact information nice