> Here's my proof >It boils down to these three key points: >1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almo

> Here's my proof >It boils down to these three key points: >1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives). >2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 -- claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks -- reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer." >3.)The NSA would've known the hack was taking place, thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied This logic is worthy of r/itsaunixsystem I don't personally believe the DNC was hacked by the Russians either, but this is pathetic and falls into the category of "not even wrong."