3 ms·
Having spent a lot of time in poor areas with heavy gang presence, the people I know tend to not be gleeful or chummy about the police, but they understand they
by brobdingnagians 6y ago
Having spent a lot of time in poor areas with heavy gang presence, the people I know tend to not be gleeful or chummy about the police, but they understand they serve a purpose and want to keep the peace in their neighborhoods. When you have police helicopters going over your house at night on a regular basis and every window on every house has bars, you have a very real, visceral connection with wanting to be safe. They understand that some young people get mixed up in gangs, and want to help them. Part of that is in keeping the peace. Especially when you have rival gangs shooting innocent people randomly in the streets just because of the color of their skin; the color of the skin of the rival gang. I can see how people in those areas would be hesitant about abolishing the police, or even drastically reducing numbers. You just want to raise your kids in peace.
- charwalker 6y agoI've taken the approach to anything with political implications that everything is more complicated than it seems, even after digging into the issue. In this case, "Defund the Police" can mean a hundred different policy approaches from as simple as cut funding/staff/resources to as complex as redistributing that funding and resources to non-police support structures like social workers, mental health professionals, and the other roles that an omnibus police department handles. In that sense, I don't support straight defunding of police. I do support redistributing funding/resources to new or expanded public health departments with a push for mental health and drug abuse support. But that needs to happen as part of a larger approach to decriminalization of drug possession/use (not selling/distributing, just possession/use), criminal justice reform where those convicted of such nonviolent crimes are released and record scrubbed, plus support for those to gain an education or employment without stigma. Ideally we can establish programs and tools to tackle the problems that led to a life of crime or drug abuse, focusing on reform. That should also include immigration reform and the elimination of 'illegal' terms by expanding quotas and simplifying the process for citizenship. Cheaper education, child care, and medical care/prescriptions are also needed to reduce the burden on most working Americans so they can educate themselves, find better employment, and better care for themselves and their family. Ending food insecurity (which, by the way, it's insane the US even has) would be a solid start. People join gangs because they solve problems they face like wanting to belong, physical/financial security, etc. By working to resolve those issues for anyone in the states, immigrant or citizen, we can address the root cause not the symptoms. Much more complicated that it seems, and that's not even getting into the various departments/programs/bills/etc required to progress that. This is also a heavily opinionated comment that clearly leans liberal and would face plenty of challenges from the current conservative side of US politics. But it would also be progress toward solving a series of issues that undermine freedom and peaceful society.